What the Research Tells Us About the Functional Movement Screen
Written by Dr. Rob Butler, DPT, PT, PhD Video
<== Video for Mj3PMExF ==>
Topics Covered
-
Reliability
- Instead of looking at the composite score, research is looking towards individual performance of each test.
- Tests with lower relability
- Understanding the correct scoring criteria is key
-
Injury Validity
- FMS is designed to look for movement deficits
- Studies: professional football, marines in training, fire fighters
-
Modifiability
- The relationship between general movement training and FMS results
- Not all training programs improve FMS results
- Improving movement with screen-based programming
-
Performance Validity
- US Track & Field Athletes
- The importance of individual tests
-
FMS & Age
- 20-50 yrs average score = 15
- After 50, FMS scores decline 1.5 points per decade
-
FMS & Childhood Obesity
- Children at a normal average weight score better on the FMS than children who are overweight
- The importance of movement in physical education
-
Screening the Ankle
- Decreased dorsiflexion correlates with decreased shoulder mobility.
- Finding result in greater connection throughout our body than we think
Related Resources
-
Highlights from FMS in 2016
Posted by FMS
Please login to leave a comment
3 Comments
-
Bryan Quigley 7/2/2015 1:30:13 PM
Great video! We have been doing great work here with help of FMS and we look forward to connecting more this year! Keep up the good work!!
-
Balanced Athlete 8/5/2015 1:35:16 PM
Good video! Thanks! I'm gonna start watching to see the correlation between limited dorsi-flexion and shoulder mobility.
-
Dennis Sheehan 7/2/2018 2:04:15 PM
Excellent presentation! I learned a lot. Thanks.