My Body Let Me Down . . . Again
Posted by Gray Cook
Dr. Robert Butler of Duke University discusses the typical FMS score. A score of 14 is considered to be the ideal number that in theory someone would be required to clear for higher level movement training. There is often debate that a 14 may be a lofty goal, but Dr. Butler displays research indicating that may not necesarily be the case.
Posted by Gray Cook
Posted by Gray Cook
Posted by Michele Desser
Thanks for this review- One quick question I have. When I got certified and in looking at the research it was said that the score to be deemed "Ok" was 15. Are you guys now thinking a score of 14 is what should be scored? I believe the studies showed a score of 14 and below to be higher risk for I jury scores.
"Hi there, it may be of interest, just editing data on 220 players that I have worked with for the past 2 years. Similar to Schneiders et al my mean composite score is 15.63. The average frequency was as follows: 1 (18), 2 (131) and 3 (70). Both the mean composite score and frequency of 2's concurs with the above video"
Research suggests that a score of 14 or below increases risk of injury in certain population groups. So just to be safe statistically, 15 is where you would want to be. A 14 means there are no asymmetries which we know increases injury risks. We want more than a 14, but a 14 is at least 2s on everything.
Dr butler , does the standard of 14 apply also to all age groups . Im about to embark on an FMS study examining high school runners and their predisposition to injury throughout the season based on FMS scores , SHould they be able to utilized the baseline 14 score as well even though their may not be developmentally or physically mature?
Hi there!
I'm just wondering..... Are these studies published in a journal? Like British Journal of Sports Medicine or something? Or is it possible to find them in Pubmed? Do you have links to them..? (haha! overexited!) I really like to read more about them for inspiration! Thanks for posting this! :)